Results from a Phase 3 registered clinical trial have demonstrated that Taltz (ixekizumab) improves disease activity and physical function in patients with psoriasis arthritis.
The study, “Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1,” was published in the journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
Eli Lilly’s Taltz was approved both in the U.S. and Europe for patients with plaque psoriasis earlier this year, and is a drug that specifically blocks the immune factor IL-17, believed to play a key role in psoriasis mechanisms.
The trial, titled “A Study of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (SPIRIT-P1)” (NCT01695239), recruited patients who had not previously taken any biological drugs. A total of 417 patients were randomized into one of four groups, with 106 patients receiving placebo, 101 patients receiving Humira (adalimumab) as an active reference drug, 103 receiving 80 mg Taltz once every two weeks, and 107 patients being treated with 80 mg Taltz once every four weeks. Both groups treated with Taltz first received a 160 mg starting dose.
After 24 weeks, more than half of the patients in both Taltz groups showed improvement compared to those receiving placebo — 62.1 percent in the group receiving biweekly treatment and 57.9 percent in the group receiving treatment once a month. Patients treated with Taltz also had less structural damage after 24 weeks, based on radiographic assessment of bone erosions and joint narrowing in the hands and feet.
The study also assessed a large number of other factors, such as the percentage of psoriasis-affected body surface area, inflammation in tendons, finger swelling and itch.
Patients receiving Humira also improved during the trial, but the study did not investigate differences between the drugs since the study was too small to detect any such differences.
More patients in the Taltz and Humira groups reported side effects more often than those in the placebo group. In total, 2.4 percent (10 patients) quit the trial because of adverse effects. Of them, four stopped treatment because of injection site reactions. One patient stopped the treatment because of worsening depression, which was also reported by three other patients in the Taltz group.
The lowering levels of immune cells called neutrophils was relatively common, but no cases of the most severe form of this side effect occurred. There were also no cases of severe heart or lung disease, or inflammatory bowel disease.
Infections were equally common in all groups, including placebo, but four patients treated with Taltz or Humira had more severe infections. Sensitivity in the form of rash also occurred in a few patients, and some developed antibodies against Taltz, but none of them were of the type that could prevent the treatment from working.
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?